Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29955469-20170511023725/@comment-30161070-20170511213354

the joke template looks hilarious though I agree with Scoobs on potential color changes.

I'm am also very glad to hear I am not being directly targeted in this matter, as it did very much seem that way.

I do not think the general reputation of the site is damaged by joke Kaiju. Most if not all of the new users that have showed up here recently have made mostly serious content regardless of the parody Kaiju quantity.

Also this may surprise you, but my parodies do tend to take an amount of thought. They are almost always deconstructions of the thing they're parodying and the flaws of said source material, and I enjoy finding clever ways of exploiting them. I'll admit that I have been guilty of just making a funny looking image and throwing a backstory onto it, but those are rare occasions. *looks at Pingas King*. I don't expect everyone to find them funny, so it's fine if apparently the only one of my parodies you've liked is Candy Corn Godzilla of all things. I suppose satirical work is just my forte or comfort zone when it comes to creating content on this wiki. I don't want to sound like I'm asking for praise for the five seconds of effort taken to make something like Satan Godzilla's infobox image. A simple "lol" or "this is funny" will suffice. I do not claim that my parody kaiju are of the same quality as the more serious content on the wiki. They aren't, with the possible execptiong of  T-Rex if  only due to the sheer amount of content I've poured into that page. Oh and maybe this mess  to considering it took me weeks to write for some reason.

Thank you very much for clearing things up in general. As mentioned before, I'll work on crediting, though that topic seems to have been settled already.